<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/1003/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/1003</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:15:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A.K.Farrar</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/1003/comment-page-1#comment-178389</link>
		<dc:creator>A.K.Farrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/?p=1003#comment-178389</guid>
		<description>Depends on the age, depends on the nationality, gender make-up, etc, etc ...

Classic English school of early 20th century - Julius Caesar: No sex, short, violent.

Wishywashy liberals who don&#039;t understand the play choose &#039;The Dream&#039;.

Macbeth was the first I was &#039;taught&#039; - jolly good too.

R and J only if you explain the sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on the age, depends on the nationality, gender make-up, etc, etc &#8230;</p>
<p>Classic English school of early 20th century &#8211; Julius Caesar: No sex, short, violent.</p>
<p>Wishywashy liberals who don&#8217;t understand the play choose &#8216;The Dream&#8217;.</p>
<p>Macbeth was the first I was &#8216;taught&#8217; &#8211; jolly good too.</p>
<p>R and J only if you explain the sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeLisa</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/1003/comment-page-1#comment-178336</link>
		<dc:creator>DeLisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/?p=1003#comment-178336</guid>
		<description>I think MUCH ADO is a great one for teens.  R&amp;J sets up a bad model for teen love, equating it with rebellion, bad choices and self-destruction - but MUCH ADO is romantic in a way that challenges both participants.  It&#039;s fun and funny and shows how hard it is to resist romance, something teens are exploring for the first time in their lives....

Also - what about Henry VI and his struggles to grow up and be a responsible leader?  Some kids might relate to that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think MUCH ADO is a great one for teens.  R&amp;J sets up a bad model for teen love, equating it with rebellion, bad choices and self-destruction &#8211; but MUCH ADO is romantic in a way that challenges both participants.  It&#8217;s fun and funny and shows how hard it is to resist romance, something teens are exploring for the first time in their lives&#8230;.</p>
<p>Also &#8211; what about Henry VI and his struggles to grow up and be a responsible leader?  Some kids might relate to that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/1003/comment-page-1#comment-178306</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/?p=1003#comment-178306</guid>
		<description>A topic near and dear to my Geek heart, as I&#039;m sure you well know.  My 6, 4 and 2 year olds can explain to you the story of The Tempest, and have been able to for a good while now (many stories about this on the blog).   If you look at it relative to Shakespeare&#039;s career, and feel the need to explain the different between the &quot;late&quot;, romance plays versus the more traditional tragedy/comedy distinction, then yes, it&#039;s somewhat tricky.  But if you start with plot, it&#039;s a near perfect fairy tale -- little girl on a faraway island, mother out of the picture, father can do magic, discovers she&#039;s a long lost princess, prince comes to rescue her and they all live happily ever after?  Great stuff, very easy for kids to understand.  You know you&#039;re doing something right when you hear the 3 year old calling her dolls Miranda and Ariel and even Sycorax.

I found Dream harder to explain, actually.  I thought it would be straightforward, what with all the fairies and such things, but there&#039;s some fairly dark sexual overtones to the story that you have to dance around.  How do you explain the plot point that basically says &quot;Oberon wanted the boy that Titania was taking care of, so he drugged her and then just took him?&quot;  That hardly makes him out to be a good guy, to a child.  It wasn&#039;t until Alan pointed out to me that Oberon is doing the boy a favor, that Titania is keeping him from growing up, that it began to form into something more understandable.

What would I teach?  Honestly, I might still go with Romeo and Juliet, purely out of the popularity factor.  You can only imagine what it&#039;s like when my toddlers make Tempest references in front of adults, and they&#039;re left with a blank stare because nobody got it.  Everybody, however, gets Romeo and Juliet.  I&#039;ve never turned on the tv and seen a random sitcom doing a version of Troilus and Cressida.  It&#039;s always R&amp;J, or Dream.  

http://www.shakespearegeek.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A topic near and dear to my Geek heart, as I&#8217;m sure you well know.  My 6, 4 and 2 year olds can explain to you the story of The Tempest, and have been able to for a good while now (many stories about this on the blog).   If you look at it relative to Shakespeare&#8217;s career, and feel the need to explain the different between the &#8220;late&#8221;, romance plays versus the more traditional tragedy/comedy distinction, then yes, it&#8217;s somewhat tricky.  But if you start with plot, it&#8217;s a near perfect fairy tale &#8212; little girl on a faraway island, mother out of the picture, father can do magic, discovers she&#8217;s a long lost princess, prince comes to rescue her and they all live happily ever after?  Great stuff, very easy for kids to understand.  You know you&#8217;re doing something right when you hear the 3 year old calling her dolls Miranda and Ariel and even Sycorax.</p>
<p>I found Dream harder to explain, actually.  I thought it would be straightforward, what with all the fairies and such things, but there&#8217;s some fairly dark sexual overtones to the story that you have to dance around.  How do you explain the plot point that basically says &#8220;Oberon wanted the boy that Titania was taking care of, so he drugged her and then just took him?&#8221;  That hardly makes him out to be a good guy, to a child.  It wasn&#8217;t until Alan pointed out to me that Oberon is doing the boy a favor, that Titania is keeping him from growing up, that it began to form into something more understandable.</p>
<p>What would I teach?  Honestly, I might still go with Romeo and Juliet, purely out of the popularity factor.  You can only imagine what it&#8217;s like when my toddlers make Tempest references in front of adults, and they&#8217;re left with a blank stare because nobody got it.  Everybody, however, gets Romeo and Juliet.  I&#8217;ve never turned on the tv and seen a random sitcom doing a version of Troilus and Cressida.  It&#8217;s always R&amp;J, or Dream.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.shakespearegeek.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.shakespearegeek.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

