<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six Degrees of Sir Francis Bacon: Dan Aykroyd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:15:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neel Mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354/comment-page-1#comment-2981</link>
		<dc:creator>Neel Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 03:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354#comment-2981</guid>
		<description>UnixMan, I&#039;m impressed. I never would&#039;ve thought that Richard Nixon would link to Shakespeare. This makes Tricky Dick a fascinating two-degree name to remember.

&lt;i&gt;Shakespeare is the most common, but Queen Elizabeth I and Thomas Jefferson are useful too.&lt;/i&gt;

And don&#039;t forget Georg Cantor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UnixMan, I&#8217;m impressed. I never would&#8217;ve thought that Richard Nixon would link to Shakespeare. This makes Tricky Dick a fascinating two-degree name to remember.</p>
<p><i>Shakespeare is the most common, but Queen Elizabeth I and Thomas Jefferson are useful too.</i></p>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget Georg Cantor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354/comment-page-1#comment-2975</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354#comment-2975</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good strategy.  We had discussed a week or two ago that it might be valuable (as it is in the Kevin Bacon game) to have a few one-degree names in mind.  Shakespeare is the most common, but Queen Elizabeth I and Thomas Jefferson are useful too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good strategy.  We had discussed a week or two ago that it might be valuable (as it is in the Kevin Bacon game) to have a few one-degree names in mind.  Shakespeare is the most common, but Queen Elizabeth I and Thomas Jefferson are useful too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnixMan</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354/comment-page-1#comment-2974</link>
		<dc:creator>UnixMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354#comment-2974</guid>
		<description>I have actually read back through some of the past weeks so as soon as I saw Nixon I knew it was easy. I hvae been trying a few others and while 4 is doable a few ways. I can ot locate another 3 or less.


UnixMan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have actually read back through some of the past weeks so as soon as I saw Nixon I knew it was easy. I hvae been trying a few others and while 4 is doable a few ways. I can ot locate another 3 or less.</p>
<p>UnixMan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354/comment-page-1#comment-2973</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354#comment-2973</guid>
		<description>Your assumptions are correct.  The Simpsons is not acceptable, but Homer Simpson is acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your assumptions are correct.  The Simpsons is not acceptable, but Homer Simpson is acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354/comment-page-1#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 23:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s good, and in three degrees.  Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s good, and in three degrees.  Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnixMan</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354/comment-page-1#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>UnixMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 23:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>Rule Question

This start point leads me to ask would The Simpsons be acceptable as a link I am assuming not but Homer Simpson would. It makes no differance to my answer I figured that the Simpsons would be a wealth of Links but perversely Shakesphere is there but no link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule Question</p>
<p>This start point leads me to ask would The Simpsons be acceptable as a link I am assuming not but Homer Simpson would. It makes no differance to my answer I figured that the Simpsons would be a wealth of Links but perversely Shakesphere is there but no link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnixMan</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354/comment-page-1#comment-2968</link>
		<dc:creator>UnixMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 23:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354#comment-2968</guid>
		<description>Ok my First stab for the week :


Dan Aykroyd&gt; Richard Nixon &gt; William Shakespeare &gt; Francis Bacon


I thought Eric Idle Might get me there faster.

UnixMan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok my First stab for the week :</p>
<p>Dan Aykroyd&gt; Richard Nixon &gt; William Shakespeare &gt; Francis Bacon</p>
<p>I thought Eric Idle Might get me there faster.</p>
<p>UnixMan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354/comment-page-1#comment-2922</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354#comment-2922</guid>
		<description>Four steps might be an end.  That&#039;s some pretty impressive linking.

The really surprising thing is that John Locke doesn&#039;t link to Francis Bacon, since both are key British empiricists.  Locke developed his philosophies in an environment largely shaped by the ideas of Bacon.  It&#039;s odd that Wikipedia doesn&#039;t mention this.

This, plus yours, plus no entry for Beldar Conehead.  Wikipedia is really letting us down today!  (Though it did help you solve one of the themes in the &lt;a href=http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/349 rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;3D puzzle&lt;/a&gt;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four steps might be an end.  That&#8217;s some pretty impressive linking.</p>
<p>The really surprising thing is that John Locke doesn&#8217;t link to Francis Bacon, since both are key British empiricists.  Locke developed his philosophies in an environment largely shaped by the ideas of Bacon.  It&#8217;s odd that Wikipedia doesn&#8217;t mention this.</p>
<p>This, plus yours, plus no entry for Beldar Conehead.  Wikipedia is really letting us down today!  (Though it did help you solve one of the themes in the <a href=http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/349 rel="nofollow">3D puzzle</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neel Mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354/comment-page-1#comment-2921</link>
		<dc:creator>Neel Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/354#comment-2921</guid>
		<description>Huh. When I saw that this week&#039;s choice was Dan Aykroyd, I thought I could try some sort of musical inroads, seeing as how he (for some mysterious reason) is part of the chorus to &quot;We Are the World.&quot; Somehow, I thought the journey would be more rewarding if it went through Lionel Richie.

But he&#039;s got a strange Wikipedia page. Doesn&#039;t mention USA for Africa, or even Harold Ramis!

Dan &quot;Grocer&quot; Aykroyd &gt; Pierre &quot;I&#039;m not Garry&quot; Trudeau &gt; John &quot;Walkabout&quot; Locke &gt; Thomas &quot;White Chocolate&quot; Jefferson &gt; Frankie &quot;Strips&quot; Bacon

4 steps. It&#039;s a start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. When I saw that this week&#8217;s choice was Dan Aykroyd, I thought I could try some sort of musical inroads, seeing as how he (for some mysterious reason) is part of the chorus to &#8220;We Are the World.&#8221; Somehow, I thought the journey would be more rewarding if it went through Lionel Richie.</p>
<p>But he&#8217;s got a strange Wikipedia page. Doesn&#8217;t mention USA for Africa, or even Harold Ramis!</p>
<p>Dan &#8220;Grocer&#8221; Aykroyd &gt; Pierre &#8220;I&#8217;m not Garry&#8221; Trudeau &gt; John &#8220;Walkabout&#8221; Locke &gt; Thomas &#8220;White Chocolate&#8221; Jefferson &gt; Frankie &#8220;Strips&#8221; Bacon</p>
<p>4 steps. It&#8217;s a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

