<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Promise, Chuck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/50/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/50</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:15:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/50/comment-page-1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/50#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I agree that Republicans who have done a turn-about with the polls don&#039;t deserve any love from liberals.  But Hagel has been willing to speak his mind, regardless of whether or not he agrees with the administration, pretty much the whole time.  I&#039;ve always admired him for it.  I just didn&#039;t have a blog before.  And I don&#039;t agree with him on most of the issues, so I wouldn&#039;t vote for him, or ask anybody else to.  But I do respect him, and I wanted to be on the record as having at least one Republican that I like, so I can&#039;t be accused of hating all Republicans when this blog goes where we all know it&#039;s destined to go.

Love the application of groupthink to the Bush administration.  I assume the part about Bush, the Rapture, and cognitive dissonance was part of a larger conversation.  But I&#039;ve heard some suggest that President Bush&#039;s policies on energy, the national debt, and protecting the enviornment are based on the coming of the Rapture and the End of Days.

I can&#039;t describe the degree to which I hope that&#039;s not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Republicans who have done a turn-about with the polls don&#8217;t deserve any love from liberals.  But Hagel has been willing to speak his mind, regardless of whether or not he agrees with the administration, pretty much the whole time.  I&#8217;ve always admired him for it.  I just didn&#8217;t have a blog before.  And I don&#8217;t agree with him on most of the issues, so I wouldn&#8217;t vote for him, or ask anybody else to.  But I do respect him, and I wanted to be on the record as having at least one Republican that I like, so I can&#8217;t be accused of hating all Republicans when this blog goes where we all know it&#8217;s destined to go.</p>
<p>Love the application of groupthink to the Bush administration.  I assume the part about Bush, the Rapture, and cognitive dissonance was part of a larger conversation.  But I&#8217;ve heard some suggest that President Bush&#8217;s policies on energy, the national debt, and protecting the enviornment are based on the coming of the Rapture and the End of Days.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t describe the degree to which I hope that&#8217;s not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeLisa</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/50/comment-page-1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>DeLisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespeareteacher.com/blog/archives/50#comment-55</guid>
		<description>You know it&#039;s actually not so rare these days to find Republican opposition to the adminstration.  They&#039;ve been quite the &quot;cut and run&quot;ners of late.  It&#039;s hard for me to admire any of them for that.  They&#039;ve coddled the neo-cons all the way to disaster for 7 years.  Actually I e-mailed the following yesterday to some pals - I submit for your consideration as well:

Speaking of Bush, The Rapture, &amp; cognitive dissonance - the following definition of GroupThink could be the textbook definition of the current administration, no?

Symptoms of groupthink
Irving Janis devised eight symptoms that are indicative of &quot;groupthink&quot;:

 - A feeling of invulnerability creates excessive optimism and encourages risk taking. 
 - Discounting warnings that might challenge assumptions. 
 - An unquestioned belief in the group&#039;s morality, causing members to ignore the consequences of their actions. 
 - Stereotyped views of enemy leaders. 
 - Pressure to conform against members of the group who disagree. 
 - Shutting down of ideas that deviate from the apparent group consensus. 
 - An illusion of unanimity with regards to going along with the group. 
 - Mindguards- self-appointed members who shield the group from dissenting opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know it&#8217;s actually not so rare these days to find Republican opposition to the adminstration.  They&#8217;ve been quite the &#8220;cut and run&#8221;ners of late.  It&#8217;s hard for me to admire any of them for that.  They&#8217;ve coddled the neo-cons all the way to disaster for 7 years.  Actually I e-mailed the following yesterday to some pals &#8211; I submit for your consideration as well:</p>
<p>Speaking of Bush, The Rapture, &#038; cognitive dissonance &#8211; the following definition of GroupThink could be the textbook definition of the current administration, no?</p>
<p>Symptoms of groupthink<br />
Irving Janis devised eight symptoms that are indicative of &#8220;groupthink&#8221;:</p>
<p> &#8211; A feeling of invulnerability creates excessive optimism and encourages risk taking.<br />
 &#8211; Discounting warnings that might challenge assumptions.<br />
 &#8211; An unquestioned belief in the group&#8217;s morality, causing members to ignore the consequences of their actions.<br />
 &#8211; Stereotyped views of enemy leaders.<br />
 &#8211; Pressure to conform against members of the group who disagree.<br />
 &#8211; Shutting down of ideas that deviate from the apparent group consensus.<br />
 &#8211; An illusion of unanimity with regards to going along with the group.<br />
 &#8211; Mindguards- self-appointed members who shield the group from dissenting opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

