{"id":158,"date":"2007-04-09T06:59:22","date_gmt":"2007-04-09T11:59:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/archives\/158"},"modified":"2008-02-14T10:49:23","modified_gmt":"2008-02-14T15:49:23","slug":"question-of-the-week-13","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/archives\/158","title":{"rendered":"Question of the Week"},"content":{"rendered":"

Two weeks ago, the Question of the Week<\/a> was about books different people were reading. Pensive Ro<\/a> picked up on the idea and posted the question<\/a> on her own blog (which you should all visit several times a day until she reaches her 20,000 hits). In the comments section, I mentioned Wikipedia<\/a> and that sparked a discussion of its own.<\/p>\n

Personally, I love Wikipedia. I probably access it more often than any other website. I even made a game<\/a> out of it which I continued to post to the blog long after it became clear that most people didn’t want to play it. Wikipedia is great for getting background information, or exploring a topic you know very little about. It’s great for learning about new topics and exploring just to see what’s out there.<\/p>\n

I would not use Wikipedia to learn more about an area that I’m already an expert in, and I would never cite Wikipedia as a source. You never really know who the author is, and the articles are in constant flux. I wouldn’t respect any argument that relied on information from Wikipedia to make its case. This Onion<\/em> article<\/a> is way over the top, granted, but it does make a few valid points.<\/p>\n

I was giving a presentation once, and said (after giving the above argument) that there had been studies done that demonstrate that Wikipedia is just as reliable of a source as the Encyclopedia Britannica. Someone asked me what my source for that was, and I couldn’t resist answering “Wikipedia<\/a>” though I had heard it in legitimate news outlets as well.<\/p>\n

Fine word, legitimate. We know that news sources have bias. Could it be that Wikipedia’s negotiated definition of reality is more objective than any one source can be? Perhaps. And perhaps this is part of a larger trend of how knowledge is now constructed<\/a>.<\/p>\n

For their part, the Wikipedia folks recognize the limitations of their medium and have launched a sister project, Citizendium<\/a>, which is a Wikipedia-like online interactive encyclopedia that requires contributors to use their real names and is given “gentle expert oversight” by Ph.Ds. Full disclosure: I have a Ph.D.<\/a> in Shakespeare Teachery, and I can tell you that not all Ph.Ds agree on everything. Or anything, really. You’d think it would work on the level of an encyclopedia, but even many supposed facts are in dispute.<\/p>\n

Speaking of Ph.Ds, something interesting just happened over at Weblogg-ed<\/a>. Will Richardson posted an article<\/a> about a new degree in Social Computing which he thinks is worthy of ridicule. Some interpreted this as a rebuke of higher education in general, and a fierce debate was sparked. Richardson then issued a clarification<\/a>. Definitely worth checking out.<\/p>\n

What’s your opinion of Wikipedia and the changing nature of authority?<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Two weeks ago, the Question of the Week was about books different people were reading. Pensive Ro picked up on the idea and posted the question on her own blog (which you should all visit several times a day until she reaches her 20,000 hits). In the comments section, I mentioned Wikipedia and that sparked […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41,24,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-information-literacy","category-question","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shakespeareteacher.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}